The Supreme Court on Friday said that 'Arya Samaj' has no right to issue marriage certificates. Along with this, the Supreme Court rejected the bail plea of the accused of kidnapping and raping a minor girl. A vacation bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Justices BV Nagarathna rejected the argument of the counsel for the accused that the girl was an adult and both had married in an 'Arya Samaj' temple. He also has a marriage certificate as a document.
The seat said that Arya Samaj has no privilege to give marriage endorsement. This is the occupation of the officials. Advocate Rishi Matoliya showed up in the interest of the complainant young lady. He said that the casualty has made claims of assault against the blamed in her assertion recorded under Section 164 of CrPC. From that point, the seat dismissed the bail use of the charged.
As indicated by the report of information organization PTI, a body of evidence was enlisted against the blamed at police headquarters Padukalan, Nagaur under segments 363, 366A, 384, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act. On May 5, 2022, the Rajasthan High Court had dismissed the bail request of the captured charged. The guidance for the charged had contended under the steady gaze of the High Court that the FIR was held up with a deferral of one and a half years and the justification for the said delay was not made sense of by the complainant.
The legal advisor further said that the casualty is a grown-up and she has previously been hitched to the charged in the 'Arya Samaj' sanctuary. The testament of this marriage is additionally accessible in the record. On this, the High Court had said that the person in question, in her proclamation recorded under Section 164 of CrPC, has asserted assault against the candidate (kid). Nonetheless, the court likewise noticed that the young lady had said in her proclamation that the blamed had taken her unique on a clear paper.
